Political Economy (1850 ed.)
This work is a summary statement of the nature of economic thought by one of the leading theorists of the English classical school in the mid-19th century.
This work is a summary statement of the nature of economic thought by one of the leading theorists of the English classical school in the mid-19th century.
Spencer attempts a synthesis of his thought and expounds the first systematic theory of evolution in this work.
Condorcet’s essay is an early defence of the right of women to particpate in politcs. It was written during the first years of the French Revolution.
A collection of papers which explores methodoogy, econometrics, social cost, monopoly theory, the supply of money, interest theory, and macroeconomics. It contains papers by: Ludwig M. Lachmann, “An Austrian Stocktaking: Unsettled Questions and Tentative Answers” John B. Egger, “The Austrian Method” Mario J. Rizzo, “Praxeology and Econometrics: A Critique of Positivist Economics” Israel M. Kirzner, “Economics and Error” S.C. Littlechild, “The Problem of Social Cost” D.T. Armentano, “A Critique of Neoclassical and Austrian Monopoly Theory” Gerald P. O'Driscoll, Jr., “Spontaneous Order and the Coordination of Economic Activities” Murray N. Rothbard, “Austrian Definitions of the Supply of Money” Lawrence S. Moss, “The Emergence of Interest in a Pure Exchange Economy: Notes on a Theorem Attributed to Ludwig von Mises” Roger W. Garrison, “Austrian Macroeconomics: A Diagrammatical Exposition” Louis M. Spadaro, “Toward a Program of Research and Development for Austrian Economics”
A short essay in which the great English observer of American politics evaluates the predictions of Hamilton and Tocqueville about the course of American democracy.
This volume is a collection of essays which examines some of the central themes and ideologies central to the formation of the United States including Edmund Burke’s theories on property rights and government, the influence of Jamaica on the American colonies, the relations between religious and legal understandings of the concept of liberty, the economic understanding of the Founders, the conflicting viewpoints between moral sense theory and the idea of natural rights in the founding period, the divisions in thought among the revolutionaries regarding the nature of liberty and the manner in which liberty was to be preserved, and the disparity in Madison’s political thought from the 1780s to the 1790s.
A condensed version (in verse) of two Indian classics of religious poetry.
The basis of this version of The Principles of Natural and Politic Law is Thomas Nugent’s 1763 English translation, which became a standard textbook at Cambridge and at many premier American colleges, including Princeton, Harvard, and the University of Pennsylvania. The first scholarly work on Burlamaqui was written by an American, M. Ray Forrest Harvey, who in 1937 argued that Burlamaqui was well known among America’s Founding Fathers and that his writings exerted considerable influence on the American constitutional system. In his introduction, Nugent said of Burlamaqui: “His singular beauty consists in the alliance he so carefully points out between ethics and jurisprudence, religion and politics, after the example of Plato and Tully, and the other illustrious masters of antiquity.”
This was Pufendorf’s first work, published in 1660. Its appearance effectively inaugurated the modern natural-law movement in the German-speaking world. The work also established Pufendorf as a key figure and laid the foundations for his major works, which were to sweep across Europe and North America. Pufendorf rejected the concept of natural rights as liberties and the suggestion that political government is justified by its protection of such rights, arguing instead for a principled limit to the state’s role in human life.