This is my archive

bar

A dialogue on the principles of the constitution and legal liberty, compared with despotism; applied to the American question; and the Probable Events of the War, with observations on some important law authorities.

This piece depicts a fictional exchange between a representative of imperial administration, Aristocraticus, and a defender of America, Philodemus, making the case for colonial self-government. The example of Ireland plays a prominent role as proving the lack of any necessity for a single, unitary imposition of authority. And to the extent that Englishmen residing in England are not themselves represented in Parliament, this shows only that “the representation is defective, unjust.”

/ Learn More

An appeal to the justice and interests of the people of Great Britain, in the present disputes with America. By an old Member of Parliament.

This text refutes Parliament’s total supremacy as new policy. Taking the perspective of an English resident, the author disavows all authority to taxing colonials without consent. Ireland is seen as “a case more exactly similar to that of America,” where Parliament’s power is “always asserted,” but “for purposes of a revenue, never.” George II, a “Whig king,” who respected charters, is noted for requesting the colonies be reimbursed, belying claims that America did not provide for its defense.

/ Learn More